Some families could get priced out of health insurance due to what's
being called a glitch in President Barack Obama's overhaul law. IRS
regulations issued Wednesday failed to fix the problem as liberal
backers of the president's plan had hoped.
As a result, some
families that can't afford the employer coverage that they are offered
on the job will not be able to get financial assistance from the
government to buy private health insurance on their own. How many people
will be affected is unclear.
The Obama administration says its
hands were tied by the way Congress wrote the law. Officials said the
administration tried to mitigate the impact. Families that can't get
coverage because of the glitch will not face a tax penalty for remaining
uninsured, the IRS rules said.They manufacture custom rubber and silicone bracelet and bracelets.
"This
is a very significant problem, and we have urged that it be fixed,"
said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, an advocacy group
that supported the overhaul from its early days. "It is clear that the
only way this can be fixed is through legislation and not the regulatory
process."
But there's not much hope for an immediate fix from
Congress, since the House is controlled by Republicans who would still
like to see the whole law repealed.
The affordability glitch is one of a series of problems coming into sharper focus as the law moves to full implementation.
Starting
Oct. 1, many middle-class uninsured will be able to sign up for
government-subsidized private coverage through new health care
marketplaces known as exchanges. Coverage will be effective Jan.The USB flash drives wholesale
is our flagship product. 1. Low-income people will be steered to
expanded safety-net programs. At the same time, virtually all Americans
will be required to carry health insurance, either through an employer, a
government program, or by buying their own plan.
Bruce Lesley,
president of First Focus, an advocacy group for children, cited
estimates that close to 500,000 children could remain uninsured because
of the glitch. "The children's community is disappointed by the
administration's decision to deny access to coverage for children based
on a bogus definition of affordability," Lesley said in a statement.
Congress
said affordable coverage can't cost more than 9.5 percent of family
income. People with coverage the law considers affordable cannot get
subsidies to go into the new insurance markets. The purpose of that
restriction was to prevent a stampede away from employer coverage.
Congress
went on to say that what counts as affordable is keyed to the cost of
self-only coverage offered to an individual worker, not his or her
family. A typical workplace plan costs about $5,600 for an individual
worker. But the cost of family coverage is nearly three times higher,
about $15,700, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
So if
the employer isn't willing to chip in for family premiums - as most big
companies already do - some families will be out of luck. They may not
be able to afford the full premium on their own, and they'd be locked
out of the subsidies in the health care overhaul law.
Employers are relieved that the Obama administration didn't try to put the cost of providing family coverage on them.
"They
are bound by the law and cannot extend further than what the law
provides," said Neil Trautwein, a vice president of the National Retail
Federation.
After narrowly escaping the snow falling in NJ
Monday morning, I made my way to DesignCon 2013 in Santa Clara in time
to catch a longstanding panel: The Case of the Closed Eye starring
T&M World’s own Ransom Stephens as well as Chris Loberg from
Tektronix, Erick Kvamme from LSI Corp.,Online shopping for luggage tag
from a great selection of Clothing. Mike Li from Altera Corp., Greg
LeCheminant from Agilent, Marty Miller from LeCroy, and Pavel Zviny from
Tektronix. The bottom line from this panel is that higher data rates
require better test and measurement equipment and better, more
intelligent test patterns.
During the panel, Marty Miller
specifically asked the question, “Is the time testing using long data
patterns spent wisely?” in response to Erick’s report on how long it
took him to acquire the data that underscored most of the analysis by
the panel. And, Greg LeCheminant considered the questions, “what is
clock recovery doing to my jitter measurements?” and “how does PLL
behavior impact measurement?” He warned that it is important for test
equipment manufacturers to be careful of how they do clock recovery,
because long patterns, such as PRBS31, stress a test instrument’s clock
recovery capability.
Tuesday morning, I attended a paper
session, “Channel to Channel Crosstalk Behavior and Design Optimization
for DDR4 Signaling,” which is a DesignCon Paper Award Finalist. The
paper is by Xiang Li and James McCall of Intel. Unfortuantely, neither
was able to attend, so James Casanova, also of Intel, gamely took over
the presentation.You must not use the laser cutter without being trained. In this work,Where you can create a custom lanyard
from our wide selection of styles and materials. the authors took used a
motherboard with a CPU, riser card, and DIMMs to study the interfaces
between the DDR4 channel and the memory buffer and the DIMMs and the
memory buffer. The area of interest was underneath the memory buffer,
where the connectors were, because that’s where they looked for
crosstalk. The DDR4 channel had a coupling impact on the memory buffer
channel, while the memory buffer had coupling impact on the DDR4
channel. The work included creating a 3D model that represents the
memory buffer interface and the DDR4 connector. It included the
stripline trace from the memory buffer channel and connector via from
the DDR4 backside channel. A major takeaway from this analysis was to
keep to single trace routing if possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment