Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Some families to be priced out of health overhaul

Some families could get priced out of health insurance due to what's being called a glitch in President Barack Obama's overhaul law. IRS regulations issued Wednesday failed to fix the problem as liberal backers of the president's plan had hoped.

As a result, some families that can't afford the employer coverage that they are offered on the job will not be able to get financial assistance from the government to buy private health insurance on their own. How many people will be affected is unclear.

The Obama administration says its hands were tied by the way Congress wrote the law. Officials said the administration tried to mitigate the impact. Families that can't get coverage because of the glitch will not face a tax penalty for remaining uninsured, the IRS rules said.They manufacture custom rubber and silicone bracelet and bracelets.

"This is a very significant problem, and we have urged that it be fixed," said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, an advocacy group that supported the overhaul from its early days. "It is clear that the only way this can be fixed is through legislation and not the regulatory process."

But there's not much hope for an immediate fix from Congress, since the House is controlled by Republicans who would still like to see the whole law repealed.

The affordability glitch is one of a series of problems coming into sharper focus as the law moves to full implementation.

Starting Oct. 1, many middle-class uninsured will be able to sign up for government-subsidized private coverage through new health care marketplaces known as exchanges. Coverage will be effective Jan.The USB flash drives wholesale is our flagship product. 1. Low-income people will be steered to expanded safety-net programs. At the same time, virtually all Americans will be required to carry health insurance, either through an employer, a government program, or by buying their own plan.

Bruce Lesley, president of First Focus, an advocacy group for children, cited estimates that close to 500,000 children could remain uninsured because of the glitch. "The children's community is disappointed by the administration's decision to deny access to coverage for children based on a bogus definition of affordability," Lesley said in a statement.

Congress said affordable coverage can't cost more than 9.5 percent of family income. People with coverage the law considers affordable cannot get subsidies to go into the new insurance markets. The purpose of that restriction was to prevent a stampede away from employer coverage.

Congress went on to say that what counts as affordable is keyed to the cost of self-only coverage offered to an individual worker, not his or her family. A typical workplace plan costs about $5,600 for an individual worker. But the cost of family coverage is nearly three times higher, about $15,700, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

So if the employer isn't willing to chip in for family premiums - as most big companies already do - some families will be out of luck. They may not be able to afford the full premium on their own, and they'd be locked out of the subsidies in the health care overhaul law.

Employers are relieved that the Obama administration didn't try to put the cost of providing family coverage on them.

"They are bound by the law and cannot extend further than what the law provides," said Neil Trautwein, a vice president of the National Retail Federation.

After narrowly escaping the snow falling in NJ Monday morning, I made my way to DesignCon 2013 in Santa Clara in time to catch a longstanding panel: The Case of the Closed Eye starring T&M World’s own Ransom Stephens as well as Chris Loberg from Tektronix, Erick Kvamme from LSI Corp.,Online shopping for luggage tag from a great selection of Clothing. Mike Li from Altera Corp., Greg LeCheminant from Agilent, Marty Miller from LeCroy, and Pavel Zviny from Tektronix. The bottom line from this panel is that higher data rates require better test and measurement equipment and better, more intelligent test patterns.

During the panel, Marty Miller specifically asked the question, “Is the time testing using long data patterns spent wisely?” in response to Erick’s report on how long it took him to acquire the data that underscored most of the analysis by the panel. And, Greg LeCheminant considered the questions, “what is clock recovery doing to my jitter measurements?” and “how does PLL behavior impact measurement?” He warned that it is important for test equipment manufacturers to be careful of how they do clock recovery, because long patterns, such as PRBS31, stress a test instrument’s clock recovery capability.

Tuesday morning, I attended a paper session, “Channel to Channel Crosstalk Behavior and Design Optimization for DDR4 Signaling,” which is a DesignCon Paper Award Finalist. The paper is by Xiang Li and James McCall of Intel. Unfortuantely, neither was able to attend, so James Casanova, also of Intel, gamely took over the presentation.You must not use the laser cutter without being trained. In this work,Where you can create a custom lanyard from our wide selection of styles and materials. the authors took used a motherboard with a CPU, riser card, and DIMMs to study the interfaces between the DDR4 channel and the memory buffer and the DIMMs and the memory buffer. The area of interest was underneath the memory buffer, where the connectors were, because that’s where they looked for crosstalk. The DDR4 channel had a coupling impact on the memory buffer channel, while the memory buffer had coupling impact on the DDR4 channel. The work included creating a 3D model that represents the memory buffer interface and the DDR4 connector. It included the stripline trace from the memory buffer channel and connector via from the DDR4 backside channel. A major takeaway from this analysis was to keep to single trace routing if possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment